# What crops will survive climate change? No single crop is guaranteed to survive climate change everywhere. Evidence shows impacts vary by region and crop: maize and wheat yields have already declined in many lower-latitude areas while some higher-latitude regions saw gains. Viability depends on local temperature, rainfall, pests, and management choices. The honest answer is that there is no universal survivor list. The IPCC's assessment of climate change and land, drawing on global crop and economic models, found that observed warming has already cut yields of some crops such as maize and wheat in many lower-latitude regions, while some higher-latitude regions have actually seen yield gains for crops including maize, wheat and sugar beets in recent decades. The same crop can be a loser in one place and a relative winner in another. References: [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). ## What the evidence does and does not say The IPCC does not rank crops by survival prospects. What it establishes is a set of pressures: rising temperatures, shifting rainfall, more pests and diseases, changing pollinator distributions, and more frequent extreme events such as flooding. Elevated CO2 can raise yields under smaller temperature increases, but it tends to reduce protein, zinc and iron content in crops such as wheat, so quantity and nutrition can move in opposite directions. Fruit and vegetable production is flagged as vulnerable too, especially in tropical and semi-tropical regions, where heat stress reduces fruit set and quality, although longer growing seasons can allow more plantings per year in some places. References: [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). So a crop's survival is not a property of the crop alone. It depends on where it is grown, how hot and dry that place becomes, and whether the grower can adapt through practices the IPCC highlights, such as bridging yield gaps, soil carbon sequestration, and risk-sharing tools like index-based weather insurance. References: [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). ## A concrete comparison Picture two hypothetical wheat growers. One farms in a lower-latitude region where warming and drying have compounded each other, the pattern the IPCC links to large negative yield effects in parts of the Mediterranean. Her yields fall and pests shift into her fields. The other farms at a higher latitude where recent decades brought yield gains for wheat. Same crop, opposite outcomes. Now swap in a grower of a fruit needing a period of winter cold accumulation: warmer winters may stop it producing a viable harvest at all, regardless of latitude. The lesson is that the question to ask is not which crop survives, but which crop still fits the local climate trajectory. References: [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). ## How to judge crops for your own location - Check the direction of change where you farm or garden: is the region warming and drying, warming and wetting, or gaining a longer growing season? The IPCC shows these produce very different outcomes. - Ask whether the crop depends on things climate is shifting: winter cold accumulation, reliable pollinators, or freedom from specific pests and diseases. - Consider nutrition as well as bulk yield, since higher CO2 can reduce protein and micronutrient content even when harvests grow. - Use long-run agroclimatology data, such as the NASA POWER catalogue of solar and meteorological parameters, to ground decisions in observed and projected conditions for your area rather than generic crop lists. References: [https://power.larc.nasa.gov/](https://power.larc.nasa.gov/), [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). One caveat worth stating plainly: the evidence here does not define a fixed temperature or rainfall threshold at which any named crop fails, and nothing in it supports a simple ranked list of climate-proof crops. Anyone promising one is going beyond the evidence. References: [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). A practical next step: pick one crop you rely on, look up the long-run temperature and rainfall trend for your specific location using an agroclimatology data source such as NASA POWER, and check whether that trend matches the conditions the crop needs. That single comparison tells you more than any generic survival list. References: [https://power.larc.nasa.gov/](https://power.larc.nasa.gov/), [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/). ## Sources - [https://power.larc.nasa.gov/](https://power.larc.nasa.gov/) — accessed 2026-10-18 - [https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/](https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/) — accessed 2026-10-18 Published 2026-10-18. Crop Climate Atlas editorial; AI-assisted preparation. ## Next step - [Start a search on cropclimate99.com](https://cropclimate99.com/)